The protests are covered by the First Amendment Freedom of Speech. However, violence is not protected. Threats to Jews and to those supporting Israel is not protected.

Unfortunately, yes. These students, (if they are students) have the right. But are they US students. If they are here on a Visa, they should be deported immediately

and their Visas revoked, permanently.

Unfortunately yes. These students have been so indoctrinated on college campuses they really don’t understand what is happening. Too much foreign money is being accepted by colleges.

Unfortunately yes. That is the beauty of our first amendment - it protects all speech, even speech we don't like. Only caveat is that speech that leads to violence is not protected. No other country in the world has this protection.

NO, it can be seen as aiding and abetting the enemy. Hamas is backed by Iran and Iran just threatened us on our own soil. At the UN Iran stated that if Israel did not stop, then they would attack the U.S. These so called protests have turned violent several times. That is NOT freedom of speech.

Yes, their opinion and the right to voice it publicly is protected HOWEVER if any threat of violence is made they should be immediately arrested and these 'demonstrations' should absolutely not be supported by colleges, especially any that accept tax dollars, whether state or federal.

Yes. Free speech. But NOT the violence, property damage, bullying, threats, physical lock-ins, intimidations, and support by professional, tenured teachers and university professors.

I was about to answer YES. Then I realized the classic example of a reasonable limitation on free speech is falsely yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater, due to the danger of trampling people in an effort to get out. Isn’t this similar? Calling for the killing of Jews? So No, this shouldn’t be protected free speech.

Yes, our Constitution allows them to speak. It does not allow them to destroy even one slip of paper. If the students are found to be guests in our country they should be immediately returned to their country of origin. No one should be forced to reside in a country they do not approve of and our wonderful country needs to help them be where they are welcome - which is NOT in AMERICA.

I agree with the above however, I believe it is time for the government and our tax money to get out of the colleges who do not come out and condemn these protestors and then remove the protestors from the school for good. Not only should they not be offered a place of employment but also not graduate from these schools

Yes, they have a constitutional right to protest.

What we are seeing, however, is the left's agenda going back 50 years as they began to take over our colleges and universities promoting antisemitism.coming to fruition. These young people have been indoctrinated with lies and not the truth of the history of Palestine and Israel.

These protests are probably legally protected by first amendment rights, but SHOULD NOT be because they are actually TRAITORS who are protesting in support of our enemies: Iran, Hamas and Hezbolla (Sp?)!!!

USA is in serious trouble!

I agree with many of the other responders that the protests, in and of themselves, are legal and protected by our first amendment rights. However, all of the violence that has occurred is NOT Legal and the people involved should be arrested. What I don't understand is the behavior of the college presidents and teachers who are supporting this violence. I am pleased that many financial support is being withdrawn.

"“While American citizens may have a First Amendment right to speak disgusting vitriol if they so choose, no foreign national has a right to advocate for terrorism in the United States,” Cotton wrote in a letter."

October 16, 2023

The Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas

Secretary

Department of Homeland Security

Washington, D.C. 20528

Dear Secretary Mayorkas,

I write to urge you to immediately deport any foreign national—including and especially any alien on a student visa—that has expressed support for Hamas and its murderous attacks on Israel. These fifth-columnists have no place in the United States.

Federal law is clear that any alien who “endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization”1 is inadmissible and must be deported. Swiftly removing and permanently barring from future reentry any foreign student who signed onto or shared approvingly the anti-Semitic letter from the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee on October 7 would be a good place to start. The appalling explosion of anti-Semitism in the United States over the past few weeks should disturb anyone who shares American values. While American citizens may have a First Amendment right to speak disgusting vitriol if they so choose, no foreign national has a right to advocate for terrorism in the United States.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

___________________

Tom Cotton

United States Senator

1 Immigration and Nationality Act, § 212, 8 U.S.C. § 1182.

Reference: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/21/colleges-israel-hamas-war-00122845

no foreign national has a right to advocate for terrorism in the United States.

Discussion about speech covered under the First Amendment https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-1/

Matt Long and Pastor Greg discuss what does free speech look like and is what we are seeing at places like Cooper Union and in Birmingham free speech or acts of war? Do we wait till they are in our homes or do we ask for this to stop now?

Watch: [start at 4 minute mark]

https://rumble.com/v3suwlv-is-anarchy-and-anti-american-threats-by-a-foreign-actor-free-speech-on-our-.html?start=249

Listen: 10/31 - Palestinian Protesters and Free speech? Pastor Greg helps us draw a line on Free Speech. PLUS - Rules of War? [start from 23:48 mark]

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-matt-long-show-102276755/

Calling for violence is not a First Amendment right. Let's replace the players and ponder what would happen if this were the KKK calling for the deaths of others? How would that be handled by police and politicians? The same as Hamas sympathizers? Just wondering....

The demonstrations taking place on college campuses following the Hamas attack on Israel are generally protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and peaceful assembly. However, there are exceptions to this protection, such as when speech incites violence or constitutes a true threat. It is important to note that while individuals have the right to express their opinions and beliefs, they do not have the right to engage in violent or disruptive behavior. Additionally, universities may impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on protests to ensure public safety and minimize disruption to campus activities. I read these compelling topics. I recommend that you check it out.

With a variety of games, Elastic man is entertaining. The games' extremely detailed instructions will assist you in overcoming every obstacle.

The decision for U.S. House Republicans to reach across the aisle to work with House Democrats to elect a Speaker is a matter of political strategy and can vary depending on the circumstances and goals of the Republican caucus. Here are some considerations from https://assignmentpay.com/pay-for-research-paper/ :

Political Climate: The political climate and balance of power in the House of Representatives can influence this decision. If one party has a significant majority, reaching across the aisle may not be necessary to elect a Speaker from their own party.

Bipartisanship: In some cases, seeking bipartisan cooperation and compromise can help build goodwill and foster a spirit of cooperation in the House. It can also be seen as a way to bridge divides and address critical issues.

Party Loyalty: Party loyalty is a significant factor in these decisions. Elected representatives often prioritize supporting a Speaker from their own party to advance their policy agenda.

Strategic Alliances: Sometimes, strategic alliances with members of the opposing party may be formed to influence the selection of a Speaker. This can be a tactical move to gain concessions or support for specific legislative priorities.

Consequences: Republicans who reach across the aisle to support a Democrat for Speaker may face consequences within their own party, such as loss of leadership positions or backlash from party members.

Speaker's Role: Consideration of the specific Speaker candidate's qualifications, leadership style, and willingness to work with both parties can also influence decisions.

Ultimately, the choice of whether to reach across the aisle to work with House Democrats to elect a Speaker is a political one that depends on the dynamics of the House, the priorities of the Republican caucus, and the broader political context. It's a decision made by individual representatives and party leadership based on their assessment of what serves their interests and the interests of their constituents.