Only if there has been significant population shifts since the last change. Root issue is that the Census counted non-citizens, skewing the population totals. Changing districts around without good data is just naked partisanship and will cause backlash from the Dems. Just because they did it doesn't make it right.

I do not support the gerrymandering efforts in Texas nor Indiana. The excuse that non-citizens are being counted in the Census is a smoke screen. As non-citizens can not and do not vote, however they do pay taxes and deserve representation.

The gerrymandering efforts are an attempt to secure seats. The Texas and Indiana republicans would not have to result to constitutional violations if they simply listened to their constituents and ran on popular ideals.

ACE-Step Song Generator

I do not support the gerrymandering efforts in Texas nor Indiana

Interesting poll question! 爱思助手 thinks that for people in Hong Kong who follow U.S. politics, understanding redistricting efforts like those in Texas and Indiana is helpful — especially when population data or representation fairness are at issue.

爱思助手

Hong Kong readers might use Login do WhatsApp Web to share this poll among friends and discuss whether “significant population shifts” should justify redistricting, and how census data accuracy matters.

It could be useful for Hong Kong-based political study clubs to form a Inicio de sesión en WhatsApp Web group to track updates on redistricting laws, compare with local district boundary debates, and see how concerns about partisan advantage appear in different systems.

Using Masuk WhatsApp Web , Hong Kong’s civic-minded individuals could circulate the comment by Donna Gordon in this poll (“just because they did it doesn’t make it right”) as a prompt — asking: when is redrawing districts for fairness, and when is it partisan manipulation?